A person named Yajnadevam has claimed to have deciphered the Indus script. His claim is clearly baseless. I can cite hundreds of examples to refute his claim, here I will cite three of them. These are enough to refute his baseless claim.

If the Indus script had to use 17 different symbols to represent one “letter/sound R,” then it can be called an underdeveloped, primitive script. In fact, if a script is so imprecise, then it is not worthy of being considered as a script. Contrary to such an assertion, my decipherment demonstrates that the Indus script is the most sophisticated script ever created by mankind. In fact, his claim itself is completely false.

Main reasons for failure to decipher Indus script:

Like others he failed to decipher the Indus script, because he failed to establish the relationship between the approximately 800 Indus script symbols and the 54 letters of the Sanskrit (Devanagari) alphabet.

1. He claimed to have used Cryptogram, but in reality, he was either unable to use it or did not use it at all!

2. In the end, he was arbitrarily “mapping the symbols as he wished”.

3. The result: His alleged “decipherment” produced no useful data.